Pages

Wednesday 27 February 2013

CERAMAH DAN SIMULASI LATIHAN KEBAKARAN DI KOLEJ UNITI PORT DICKSON

Kolej UNITI Port Dickosn, 23 Februari 2013- Sebuah ceramah dan simulasi latihan kebakaran telah diadakan di Dewan Za'aba dan dataran Kolej UNITI, Port Dickson Tg. Agas oleh En. Zamrus bin Mohd Sharif, Pegawai Bomba (Unit Latihan), Jabatan Bomba dan Penyelamat Telok Kemang anjuran penyelaras bagi subjek Keselamatan Kanak-kanak dan perlindungannya, Nur Akmar bin Mohd Arif dan Nurul Hidayah bte Sahrom.


Pensyarah subjek DPP 3243, Cik Hidayah (kiri) dan Cik Akmar (kanan).

Program dimulakan dengan nyanyian lagu Negaraku, lagu Kolej UNITI dan bacaan doa, kemudian disusuli pula dengan ucapan prakata oleh Dekan Fakulti Pendidikan dan Pengajian Umum (FPPM), Kolej UNITI Port Dickson En. Zakri bin Mohd Zain. Ceramah kemudiannya diteruskan oleh En. Zamrus bin Mohd Sharif selama dua jam sebelum simulasi dilakukan oleh pelajar sendiri.


Dekan FPPM, En Zakri sedang memberi ucapan prakata.



En. Zamrus bersemangat menyampaikan ceramah kebakaran kepada pelajar.


"Program ini diadakan untuk meningkatkan pengetahuan dan memberi pengalaman yang bermanfaat kepada para pelajar Semester 6 Diploma Pendidikan Pra Sekolah (DPS) yang mengambil subjek DPP 3243, iaitu Keselamatan Kanak-kanak dan Perlindungannya", terang penyelaras subjek, Cik Akmar. 

Dalam program ini, para pelajar  telah diberi pendedahan tentang panduan keselamatan kebakaran, kaedah memadamkan api kebakaran serta ciri-ciri keselamatan penubuhan tadika mengikut standard/piawai yang diiktiraf/diluluskan oleh Jabatan Bomba. Selain itu, para pelajar telah diberi peluang melakukan simulasi memadamkan api kebakaran dengan bimbingan sembilan  orang pegawai bomba dari Jabatan Bomba Telok Kemang.


Seorang pelajar lelaki DPS Sem 6 mencuba untuk lakukan simulasi memadam api



Seorang wakil siswi juga tidak ketinggalan melakukan simulasi memadamkan api kebakaran.

Program yang disertai oleh 341 pelajar sem 6 DPS ini telah dilaksanakan dengan jayanya dengan kehadiran pelajar dan sebahagian pensyarah. 


Laporan oleh:

CIK NUR AKMAR BINTI MOHD ARIF
Pengarah Ceramah dan Simulasi Latihan Kebakaran.


PROGRAM KERJASAMA FTK & JAB.PENGAJIAN UMUM, FPPM KOLEJ UNITI PORT DICKSON



Kolej UNITI, Port Dickson, 27 Feb, 2013- Alhamdulillah, hari ini adalah hari pertama aktiviti ini dijalankan. Ia merupakan sebuah program kerohanian yang bertujuan untuk melahirkan para pelajar yang berketrampilan intelek dan sahsiah diri.

Kerjasama pintar ini telah diinisiatifkan oleh FTK bersama Jabatan Pengajian Umum (JPU), dari FPPM Kolej UNITI Port Dickson. Ini kerana JPU merupakan jabatan yang merentas turut terlibat dalam urusan pengajaran dan pembelajaran pelajar di bawah FTK ini.

Seawal jam 12:30 tengahari, para pelajar telah bergerak menuju ke Surau Kolej UNITI Port Dickson, Pasir Panjang. Program dimulakan dengan ucapan aluan daripada En. Roslan bin Kamari- Dekan FTK. Antara intipati ucapan beliau selama 10 minit itu ialah penekanan objektif program Chicken Soup for The Soul khususnya kepada pelajar. " Kita mahu jadikan para pelajar sekalian pelajar yang mempunyai agenda, bukan hanya tahu atau terikat dengan pergi ke kelas, makan, dan tidur semata-mata. Kita mahukan pelajar yang ada wawasan iaitu hingga alam akhirat, " tegas Dekan FTK dalam ucapannya tadi.

Kemudian, program disusuli dengan pengisian rohani oleh pensyarah Kolej UNITI Port Dickson untuk Program Diploma Pendidikan Islam iaitu Ustaz Zainal Ariffin. Beliau cukup dikenali di Kolej ini memandangkan beliau antara 'orang lama' yang 'orang muda' dahagakan nasihat dan tazkirah.

Ustaz Zainal telah menekankan hubungan manusia dengan Tuhan sekalian alam, Allah 'Azza Wa Jalla. Beliau mengingatkan para pelajar supaya menjaga hubungan dengan Tuhan untuk kebahagiaan hari akhirat kerana itulah matlamat sebagai muslim/ ah sejati. Bagaimana? Sudah tentu dengan mematuhi segala yang dituntut dalam agama Islam dan menjauhi segala yang dilarang agama.

Beliau juga menambah, ' diri kita bukan milik kita, tetapi Allah, ' maka jagalah sebaik-baiknya diri ini kerana ia merupakan hak Allah Ta'ala, 'sudahi Ustaz Zainal dalam tazkirah ringkas sementara menunggu waktu zuhur.

Alhamdulillah, program hari ini diakhiri dengan solat berjemaah bersama pensyarah dan pelajar. Diharapkan usaha ini diberkati oleh Allah sebagai usaha mendidik pelajar yang merupakan anugerah yang sangat bernilai kepada kami.

Kejayaan program kerjasama ini diharapkan akan diadaptasi kepada Fakulti Pendidikan dan Pembangunan Manusia Kolej UNITI Port Dickson memandangkan jumlah pelajarnya yang cukup meriah. InsyaAllah.


Laporan oleh:

Cik Faridah Mohd Tap
Ketua Jabatan Pengajian Umum,
FPPM Kolej UNITI, Port Dickson







Friday 22 February 2013

PROGRAM BERSAMA FAKULTI DAN PELAJAR SEM 6


UNITI VILLAGE, Kolej UNITI (1 - 3 FEB 2013)- Sebuah program anjuran Fakulti Pendidikan dan Pengajian Umum (FPPM) bersama pelajar semester 6 program Diploma Pendidikan Pra- Sekolah telah diadakan dengan jayanya. Berikut adalah kepingan-kepingan memori program tersebut:-

Dekan FPPM, Encik Zakri merasmikan program Fakulti bersama  pelajar  DPS  sem 6.
Sesi ' ice breaking' di hari pertama program
Latihan Dalam Kumpulan (LDK)- masing2 sedang memerhati dan mendengar taklimat  pensyarah
Siswa-siswi berbakti dengan mencuci  kenderaan
Persembahan pelajar2 DPS sem 6


Banyak lagi gambar  menarik dengan lawati FB- Fakulti Pendidikan dan Pembangunan Manusia Kolej UNITI kami di

http://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.335344163244367.67436.135801743198611&type=1

TOLOOOOOOOONGGGG!!! CERAMAH & SIMULASI KEBAKARAN!



Demonstrasi memadamkan api kebakaran oleh pegawai bomba.



Program Ceramah Kebakaran & Simulasi Latihan Kebakaran yang akan diadakan untuk pelajar Semester 6 (subjek Keselamatan Kanak-kanak & Perlindungannya). Program ini diadakan dengan kerjasama Jabatan Bomba Telok Kemang yang akan diketuai oleh Ketua Balai, Encik Zamrus Bin Mohd Sharif (penceramah yang sama semasa kursus KAAK).


Program ini akan diadakan seperti ketetapan berikut: 



Tarikh: 23 Februari 2013 
Hari: Sabtu
Masa: 8.30pagi-12.00 tengahari
Tempat: Dewan Za'ba, UV, Kolej UNITI


JOM HADIR BERAMAI-RAMAI!

Thursday 21 February 2013

FPPM KOLEJ UNITI BAKAL MENJADI PENEROKA PENDIDIKAN AWAL DENGAN JENAMA 'HELPING BOYS NURTURING GIRLS'

En. Shafiai Uda Jaffar @ Pak Utih,  (tengah berbaju batik coklat)- mantan Dekan Fakulti Pendidikan dan Pembangunan Manusia (FPPM) dan kini Pengarah Institut Helping Boys, Nurturing Girls (HBNG) merupakan wakil Gurian Institut di Malaysia. Semoga usaha membangunkan pendidikan awal kanak-kanak dengan jenama 'HBNG' melalui fakulti dan institusi ini mendapat sokongan semua. 

Wednesday 13 February 2013

THE TROUBLE WITH BOYS


(The Boy Crisis.  The Gurian Institute is featured in this Newsweek cover story.)
Spend a few minutes on the phone with Danny Frankhuizen and you come away thinking, "What a nice boy." He's thoughtful, articulate, bright. He has a good relationship with his mom, goes to church every Sunday, loves the rock band Phish and spends hours each day practicing his guitar. But once he's inside his large public Salt Lake City high school, everything seems to go wrong. He's 16, but he can't stay organized. He finishes his homework and then can't find it in his backpack. He loses focus in class, and his teachers, with 40 kids to wrangle, aren't much help. "If I miss a concept, they tell me, 'Figure it out yourself'," says Danny. Last year Danny's grades dropped from B's to D's and F's. The sophomore, who once dreamed of Stanford, is pulling his grades up but worries that "I won't even get accepted at community college."
His mother, Susie Malcom, a math teacher who is divorced, says it's been wrenching to watch Danny stumble. "I tell myself he's going to make something good out of himself," she says. "But it's hard to see doors close and opportunities fall away."
What's wrong with Danny? By almost every benchmark, boys across the nation and in every demographic group are falling behind. In elementary school, boys are two times more likely than girls to be diagnosed with learning disabilities and twice as likely to be placed in special-education classes. High-school boys are losing ground to girls on standardized writing tests. The number of boys who said they didn't like school rose 71 percent between 1980 and 2001, according to a University of Michigan study. Nowhere is the shift more evident than on college campuses. Thirty years ago men represented 58 percent of the undergraduate student body. Now they're a minority at 44 percent. This widening achievement gap, says Margaret Spellings, U.S. secretary of Education, "has profound implications for the economy, society, families and democracy."
With millions of parents wringing their hands, educators are searching for new tools to help tackle the problem of boys. Books including Michael Thompson's best seller "Raising Cain" (recently made into a PBS documentary) and Harvard psychologist William Pollack's definitive work "Real Boys" have become must-reads in the teachers' lounge. The Gurian Institute, founded in 1997 by family therapist Michael Gurian to help the people on the front lines help boys, has enrolled 15,000 teachers in its seminars. Even the Gates Foundation, which in the last five years has given away nearly a billion dollars to innovative high schools, is making boys a big priority. "Helping underperforming boys," says Jim Shelton, the foundation's education director, "has become part of our core mission."
The problem won't be solved overnight. In the last two decades, the education system has become obsessed with a quantifiable and narrowly defined kind of academic success, these experts say, and that myopic view is harming boys. Boys are biologically, developmentally and psychologically different from girls--and teachers need to learn how to bring out the best in every one. "Very well-meaning people," says Dr. Bruce Perry, a Houston neurologist who advocates for troubled kids, "have created a biologically disrespectful model of education."
Thirty years ago it was girls, not boys, who were lagging. The 1972 federal law Title IX forced schools to provide equal opportunities for girls in the classroom and on the playing field. Over the next two decades, billions of dollars were funneled into finding new ways to help girls achieve. In 1992, the American Association of University Women issued a report claiming that the work of Title IX was not done--girls still fell behind in math and science; by the mid-1990s, girls had reduced the gap in math and more girls than boys were taking high-school-level biology and chemistry.
Some scholars, notably Christina Hoff Sommers, a fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, charge that misguided feminism is what's been hurting boys. In the 1990s, she says, girls were making strong, steady progress toward parity in schools, but feminist educators portrayed them as disadvantaged and lavished them with sup-port and attention. Boys, meanwhile, whose rates of achievement had begun to falter, were ignored and their problems allowed to fester (page 53).
Boys have always been boys, but the expectations for how they're supposed to act and learn in school have changed. In the last 10 years, thanks in part to activist parents concerned about their children's success, school performance has been measured in two simple ways: how many students are enrolled in accelerated courses and whether test scores stay high. Standardized assessments have become commonplace for kids as young as 6. Curricula have become more rigid. Instead of allowing teachers to instruct kids in the manner and pace that suit each class, some states now tell teachers what, when and how to teach. At the same time, student-teacher ratios have risen, physical education and sports programs have been cut and recess is a distant memory. These new pressures are undermining the strengths and underscoring the limitations of what psychologists call the "boy brain"-- the kinetic, disorganized, maddening and sometimes brilliant behaviors that scientists now believe are not learned but hard-wired.
When Cris Messler of Mountainside, N.J., brought her 3-year-old son Sam to a pediatrician to get him checked for ADHD, she was acknowledging the desperation parents can feel. He's a high-energy kid, and Messler found herself hoping for a positive diagnosis. "If I could get a diagnosis from the doctor, I could get him on medicine," she says. The doctor said Sam is a normal boy. School has been tough, though. Sam's reading teacher said he was hopeless. His first-grade teacher complains he's antsy, and Sam, now 7, has been referring to himself as "stupid." Messler's glad her son doesn't need medication, but what, she wonders, can she do now to help her boy in school?
For many boys, the trouble starts as young as 5, when they bring to kindergarten a set of physical and mental abilities very different from girls'. As almost any parent knows, most 5-year-old girls are more fluent than boys and can sight-read more words. Boys tend to have better hand-eye coordination, but their fine motor skills are less developed, making it a struggle for some to control a pencil or a paintbrush. Boys are more impulsive than girls; even if they can sit still, many prefer not to--at least not for long.
Thirty years ago feminists argued that classic "boy" behaviors were a result of socialization, but these days scientists believe they are an expression of male brain chemistry. Sometime in the first trimester, a boy fetus begins producing male sex hormones that bathe his brain in testosterone for the rest of his gestation. "That exposure wires the male brain differently," says Arthur Arnold, professor of physiological science at UCLA. How? Scientists aren't exactly sure. New studies show that prenatal exposure to male sex hormones directly affects the way children play. Girls whose mothers have high levels of testosterone during pregnancy are more likely to prefer playing with trucks to playing with dolls. There are also clues that hormones influence the way we learn all through life. In a Dutch study published in 1994, doctors found that when males were given female hormones, their spatial skills dropped but their verbal skills improved.
In elementary-school classrooms--where teachers increasingly put an emphasis on language and a premium on sitting quietly and speaking in turn--the mismatch between boys and school can become painfully obvious. "Girl behavior becomes the gold standard," says "Raising Cain" coauthor Thompson. "Boys are treated like defective girls."
Two years ago Kelley King, principal of Douglass Elementary School in Boulder, Colo., looked at the gap between boys and girls and decided to take action. Boys were lagging 10 points behind girls in reading and 14 points in writing. Many more boys --than girls were being labeled as learning disabled, too. So King asked her teachers to buy copies of Gurian's book "The Minds of Boys," on boy-friendly classrooms, and in the fall of 2004 she launched a bold experiment. Whenever possible, teachers replaced lecture time with fast-moving lessons that all kids could enjoy. Three weeks ago, instead of discussing the book "The View From Saturday," teacher Pam Unrau divided her third graders into small groups, and one student in each group pretended to be a character from the book. Classes are noisier, Unrau says, but the boys are closing the gap. Last spring, Douglass girls scored an average of 106 on state writing tests, while boys got a respectable 101.
Primatologists have long observed that juvenile male chimps battle each other not just for food and females, but to establish and maintain their place in the hierarchy of the tribe. Primates face off against each other rather than appear weak. That same evolutionary imperative, psychologists say, can make it hard for boys to thrive in middle school--and difficult for boys who are failing to accept the help they need. The transition to middle school is rarely easy, but like the juvenile primates they are, middle-school boys will do almost anything to avoid admitting that they're overwhelmed. "Boys measure everything they do or say by a single yardstick: does this make me look weak?" says Thompson. "And if it does, he isn't going to do it." That's part of the reason that videogames have such a powerful hold on boys: the action is constant, they can calibrate just how hard the challenges will be and, when they lose, the defeat is private.
When Brian Johns hit seventh grade, he never admitted how vulnerable it made him feel. "I got behind and never caught up," says Brian, now 17 and a senior at Grand River Academy, an Ohio boarding school. When his parents tried to help, he rebuffed them. When his mother, Anita, tried to help him organize his assignment book, he grew evasive about when his homework was due. Anita didn't know where to turn. Brian's school had a program for gifted kids, and support for ones with special needs. But what, Anita asked his teachers, do they do about kids like her son who are in the middle and struggling? Those kids, one of Brian's teachers told Anita, "are the ones who fall through the cracks."
It's easy for middle-school boys to feel outgunned. Girls reach sexual maturity two years ahead of boys, but other, less visible differences put boys at a disadvantage, too. The prefrontal cortex is a knobby region of the brain directly behind the forehead that scientists believe helps humans organize complex thoughts, control their impulses and understand the consequences of their own behavior. In the last five years, Dr. Jay Giedd, an expert in brain development at the National Institutes of Health, has used brain scans to show that in girls, it reaches its maximum thickness by the age of 11 and, for the next decade or more, continues to mature. In boys, this process is delayed by 18 months.
Middle-school boys may use their brains less efficiently, too. Using a type of MRI that traces activity in the brain, Deborah Yurgelun-Todd, director of the cognitive neuroimaging laboratory at McLean Hospital in Belmont, Mass., tested the activity patterns in the prefrontal cortex of children between the ages of 11 and 18. When shown pictures of fearful faces, adolescent girls registered activity on the right side of the prefrontal cortex, similar to an adult. Adolescent boys used both sides--a less mature pattern of brain activity. Teenage girls can process information faster, too. In a study about to be published in the journal Intelligence, researchers at Vanderbilt University administered timed tests--picking similar objects and matching groups of numbers--to 8,000 boys and girls between the ages of 5 and 18. In kindergarten, boys and girls processed information at about the same speeds. In early adolescence, girls finished faster and got more right. By 18, boys and girls were processing with the same speed and accuracy.
Scientists caution that brain research doesn't tell the whole story: temperament, family background and environment play big roles, too. Some boys are every bit as organized and assertive as the highest-achieving girls. All kids can be scarred by violence, alcohol or drugs in the family. But if your brain hasn't reached maturity yet, says Yurgelun-Todd, "it's not going to be able to do its job optimally."
Across the nation, educators are reviving an old idea: separate the girls from the boys--and at Roncalli Middle School, in Pueblo, Colo., administrators say, it's helping kids of both genders. This past fall, with the blessing of parents, school guidance counselor Mike Horton assigned a random group of 50 sixth graders to single-sex classes in core subjects. These days, when sixth-grade science teacher Pat Farrell assigns an earth-science lab on measuring crystals, the girls collect their materials--a Bunsen burner, a beaker of phenyl salicylate and a spoon. Then they read the directions and follow the sequence from beginning to end. The first things boys do is ask, "Can we eat this?" They're less organized, Farrell notes, but sometimes, "they're willing to go beyond what the lab asks them to do." With this in mind, he hands out written instructions to both classes but now goes over them step by step for the boys. Although it's too soon to declare victory, there are some positive signs: the shyest boys are participating more. This fall, the all-girl class did best in math, English and science, followed by the all-boy class and then coed classes.
One of the most reliable predictors of whether a boy will succeed or fail in high school rests on a single question: does he have a man in his life to look up to? Too often, the answer is no. High rates of divorce and single motherhood have created a generation of fatherless boys. In every kind of neighborhood, rich or poor, an increasing number of boys--now a startling 40 percent--are being raised without their biological dads.
Psychologists say that grandfathers and uncles can help, but emphasize that an adolescent boy without a father figure is like an explorer without a map. And that is especially true for poor boys and boys who are struggling in school. Older males, says Gurian, model self-restraint and solid work habits for younger ones. And whether they're breathing down their necks about grades or admonishing them to show up for school on time, "an older man reminds a boy in a million different ways that school is crucial to their mission in life."
In the past, boys had many opportunities to learn from older men. They might have been paired with a tutor, apprenticed to a master or put to work in the family store. High schools offered boys a rich array of roles in which to exercise leadership skills--class officer, yearbook editor or a place on the debate team. These days, with the exception of sports, more girls than boys are involved in those activities.
In neighborhoods where fathers are most scarce, the high-school dropout rates are shocking: more than half of African-American boys who start high school don't finish. David Banks, principal of the Eagle Academy for Young Men, one of four all-boy public high schools in the New York City system, wants each of his 180 students not only to graduate from high school but to enroll in college. And he's leaving nothing to chance. Almost every Eagle Academy boy has a male mentor--a lawyer, a police officer or an entrepreneur from the school's South Bronx neighborhood. The impact of the mentoring program, says Banks, has been "beyond profound." Tenth grader Rafael Mendez is unequivocal: his mentor "is the best thing that ever happened to me." Before Rafael came to Eagle Academy, he dreamed about playing pro baseball, but his mentor, Bronx Assistant District Attorney Rafael Curbelo, has shown him another way to succeed: Mendez is thinking about attending college in order to study forensic science.
Colleges would welcome more applications from young men like Rafael Mendez. At many state universities the gender balance is already tilting 60-40 toward women. Primary and secondary schools are going to have to make some major changes, says Ange Peterson, president-elect of the American Association of Collegiate Registrars and Admissions Officers, to restore the gender balance. "There's a whole group of men we're losing in education completely," says Peterson.
For Nikolas Arnold, 15, a sophomore at a public high school in Santa Monica, Calif., college is a distant dream. Nikolas is smart: he's got an encyclopedic knowledge of weaponry and war. When he was in first grade, his principal told his mother he was too immature and needed ADHD drugs. His mother balked. "Too immature?" says Diane Arnold, a widow. "He was six and a half!" He's always been an advanced reader, but his grades are erratic. Last semester, when his English teacher assigned two girls' favorites--"Memoirs of a Geisha" and "The Secret Life of Bees" Nikolas got a D. But lately, he has a math teacher he likes and is getting excited about numbers. He's reserved in class sometimes. But now that he's more engaged, his grades are improving slightly and his mother, who's pushing college, is hopeful he will begin to hit his stride. Girls get A's and B's on their report cards, she tells him, but that doesn't mean boys can't do it, too.
(This article was published in Newsweek Magazine on Jan 29, 2006)



Esok kononnya hari Valentine?? Apa pula hukum menyambutnya bagi Muslim?



Sunday 3 February 2013

BARAT SEBAR FOBIA ISLAM DALAM FILEM



Taken 2 menggambarkan Islam dengan watak antogonis



Usai menonton filem baru penuh aksi Taken 2 lakonan Liam Neeson membawa penulis kepada suatu kesimpulan mudah iaitu ia merupakan satu lagi anasir negatif berbaur jahat Barat ke atas masyarakat Islam. Filem tersebut adalah kesinambungan dari filem pertama Taken yang mengkisahkan seorang bekas agen Kerajaan, Brian Mills yang menyelamatkan anak perempuannya, Kim yang telah diculik oleh sekumpulan penjahat beragama Islam. Filem ini juga telah menjuarai carta filem beberapa minggu selepas penayangannya di pawagam-pawagam seluruh Malaysia.


Mills ditampilkan sebagai hero dalam filem Taken pertama, manakala dalam filem Taken 2 anaknya Kim memainkan peranan heroin yang cuba menyelamatkan ayah dan ibunya yang diculik oleh sekumpulan pengganas Muslim yang ingin membalas dendam ke atas kematian anak dan rakan-rakan mereka dalam Taken pertama. Sudah tentu watak antagonis dalam filem tersebut adalah orang Islam. Malah babak pertama dalam filem ini dibuka dengan bacaan surah al-Fatihah oleh ahli keluarga dan teman-taulan semasa pengkebumian para penjenayah muslim yang telah dibunuh oleh Mills dalam misi menyelamatkan anak gadisnya yang di culik dalam filem Taken pertama.


Filem ini walaupun menarik kerana penuh aksi dan terdapat unsur kekeluargaan, tetapi pada masa yang sama ia juga berbahaya kerana menyebarkan semangat fobia Islam. Dalam filem tersebut, Islam digambarkan sebagai agama terroris di mana para penjahat, iaitu penganut Islam terlibat dalam jenayah kolar putih seperti sindiket pelacuran, pembunuhan dan jenayah lain. Malah para penjenayah juga mengamalkan budaya Islamik seperti memberi salam (secara sempurna) kepada rakan penjenayah yang lain. Laungan azan juga kerap kali kedengaran setiap kali adanya babak-babak cemas penuh aksi dalam filem tersebut. Lokasi penggambaran filem iaitu di Istanbul, Turki iaitu Negara tinggalan Khilafah Uthmaniyyah terakhir selepas dihapuskan pada tahun 1924 seakan-akan sengaja mengguris hati umat Islam di seluruh dunia.


Penulis maklum, ini bukanlah filem pertama Barat terutamanya Amerika yang menyemai benih-benih fobia Islam melalui seni perfileman. Selain filem Taken (siri satu dan dua), terdapat filem-filem lain yang mendapat sambutan hangat antaranya Beyond Borders, Special Forces dan terbaru Innocent of Muslims yang mencetuskan keadaan huru-hara apabila umat Islam seluruh dunia berang dan segelintir mereka memilih untuk menyerang kedutaan Amerika di beberapa Negara Islam.


Sudah dijangka pihak Barat akan mempertahankan filem-filem tersebut terutamanya Innocent of Muslims atas nama ‘kebebasan asasi’ tetapi malangnya mereka tidak menghormati sensitiviti agama masyarakat muslim hari ini. Barat juga kelihatan berat sebelah dan bersikap defensif apabila menampilkan watak-watak utama dalam kebanyakan filem mereka yang sudah tentu digambarkan sebagai polis dan hakim dunia walaupun hakikatnya banyak peristiwa besar kehancuran jiwa manusia dalam sejarah dunia adalah bermula dari tangan mereka sendiri.


Islam Agama Keganasan: Suatu Mitos dari Barat yang Memakan Diri

Tuduhan jahat Barat mengaitkan Islam dengan keganasan sudah tentu jauh meleset. Sejarah juga telah mencatatkan Islam tersebar ke pelusuk dunia tanpa melalui mata pedang sepertimana yang dicanangkan oleh mereka. Lihat sahaja Mesir, walaupun telah diperintah oleh Muslim untuk beberapa abad sehingga hari ini, tetapi statistik menunjukkan lebih 40 ribu penduduk Mesir adalah beragama kristian secara keturunan. Malah juga di India, lebih 80 peratus adalah beragama Hindu walaupun Islam pernah memerintah wilayah India. Di Malaysia dan Indonesia, Islam menjadi agama persekutuan dan rasmi bagi kedua-dua Negara tanpa sebarang pertumpahan darah. Ini sudah cukup menafikan mitos dari Barat yang mengatakan Islam agama yang menganjurkan keganasan.


Suatu fenomena yang paling menarik ialah peningkatan penganut Islam di Amerika. Walaupun pelbagai cara dibuat oleh Amerika untuk menyemarakkan api fobia Islam ke serata dunia, tetapi sebaliknya pula yang berlaku. Ini boleh dilihat dengan melihat gelombang peningkatan penduduknya yang mula memahami dan seterusnya menganut Islam. Berita-berita serong mengenai Islam telah sebenarnya membuka mata masyarakat Barat lain untuk mengetahui ajaran Islam sebenar.


Mitos yang dicanang Amerika sebenarnya memakan diri. Di Amerika sahaja pada tahun 1970, terdapat 100 ribu Muslim di negara itu tetapi pada  tahun 2008, terdapat 9 juta Muslim dan dijangka terus meningkat untuk tahun-tahun mendatang. Peningkatan ini berterusan terutamanya selepas publisiti meluas mengenai Islam rentetan daripada peristiwa ‘September Hitam’- 9/11. Fenomena ini dibantu oleh pendakwah Muslim yang komited menjelaskan ajaran sebenar Islam selain ajaran Islam itu sendiri sesuai dengan fitrah manusia.


Kesimpulannya, pernah George Bernard Shaw menegaskan, ‘Agama yang akan menjadi pilihan golongan terpelajar, bertamadun dan yang sedar pada masa hadapan hanyalah Islam.’ (Dipetik melalui Mohamad Sofee Razak, Islam dari Cermin Mata Orientalisme, Pemikir: Oktober- Disember 2011.) Justeru, elemen fobia Islam dalam filem-filem terbitan Barat harus juga ditangani dengan adanya kerja-kerja dakwah yang lebih sistematik dan menyeluruh seperti terbitan filem Islami yang menggambarkan ajaran Islam sebenar, menghidupkan Al-Qur’an dan sunnah Rasulullah dalam kehidupan harian dan menganjurkan dialog-dialog peradaban untuk memperbetulkan persepsi masyakarat tentang Islam sebenar. Wallahu’alam.



Oleh,
FARIDAH BINTI MOHD TAP
Pensyarah Pengajian Umum,
Fakulti Pendidikan dan Pembangunan Manusia,
Kolej UNITI, Port Dickson, NSDK.

(Juga diterbitkan dalam Berita Harian, Ruangan Agama pada 31 Oktober 2012, Rabu)